Agent-Driven Corpus Linguistics: A Framework for Autonomous Linguistic Discovery
AI 摘要
提出Agent-Driven Corpus Linguistics框架,利用LLM自主进行语料库语言学研究,提升研究效率。
主要贡献
- 提出了Agent-Driven Corpus Linguistics框架
- 验证了LLM在语料库分析中的有效性
- 降低了语料库语言学研究的技术门槛
方法论
利用LLM作为Agent,通过结构化工具接口连接语料库查询引擎,实现假设生成、查询、结果解释和分析改进的自主循环。
原文摘要
Corpus linguistics has traditionally relied on human researchers to formulate hypotheses, construct queries, and interpret results - a process demanding specialized technical skills and considerable time. We propose Agent-Driven Corpus Linguistics, an approach in which a large language model (LLM), connected to a corpus query engine via a structured tool-use interface, takes over the investigative cycle: generating hypotheses, querying the corpus, interpreting results, and refining analysis across multiple rounds. The human researcher sets direction and evaluates final output. Unlike unconstrained LLM generation, every finding is anchored in verifiable corpus evidence. We treat this not as a replacement for the corpus-based/corpus-driven distinction but as a complementary dimension: it concerns who conducts the inquiry, not the epistemological relationship between theory and data. We demonstrate the framework by linking an LLM agent to a CQP-indexed Gutenberg corpus (5 million tokens) via the Model Context Protocol (MCP). Given only "investigate English intensifiers," the agent identified a diachronic relay chain (so+ADJ > very > really), three pathways of semantic change (delexicalization, polarity fixation, metaphorical constraint), and register-sensitive distributions. A controlled baseline experiment shows that corpus grounding contributes quantification and falsifiability that the model cannot produce from training data alone. To test external validity, the agent replicated two published studies on the CLMET corpus (40 million tokens) - Claridge (2025) and De Smet (2013) - with close quantitative agreement. Agent-driven corpus research can thus produce empirically grounded findings at machine speed, lowering the technical barrier for a broader range of researchers.